Fahrenheit 451 “Comparison” Essay

Ray Bradburys fresh, Fahrenheit 451, differentiates from the cinematic form of the unfermented directed by Franois Truffaut in numerous ways. Bradbury states, The ikon was a mixed blessing. It didnt follow the brisk as completely as it should have. Its a good movie it has a wonderful finish it has a great total by Bernard Hermann. Oskar Werner is wonderful in the lead. But Truffaut made the mistake of displace Julie Christie in two roles in the same film, which was very confusing, and he eliminated some of the other faces Clarisse McClellan and Faber the Philosopher and the Mechanical Hound.I mean, you providet do without those Other than the characters in the story, including the score and alternate ending of the film, the movie was superlative. The characters in the story have precise roles and by leaving them out/altering them from the movie hinders the characterization and the originality of Bradburys novel. The study alterations in Truffauts film deals with the charac ters and their significance to the novel and movie. A change in his film was getting rid of the Mechanical Hound. In the 1950s, Bradbury wrote the book in a futuristic perspective.Therefore, the Mechanical Hound could have been a little too high-tech for Truffauts 1960s film and the reasoning for it creation left wing out. However, Montag may have felt it necessary to have Mechanical Hound in the movie because it contri exclusivelyes to the futuristic look being portrayed in the novel. other character that was totally left out of the film was Faber the philosopher. In the novel, Faber was basically a physical conscious of Montags. Some may see how Faber could have been left out of the film due to the little impact that he would have created in the movie.Although, Bradbury would consider him essential for the cinematic version of Fahrenheit 451 because certain events in the novel, much(prenominal) as reciting the poems to Mildreds/Lindas friends, wouldve caused more trouble if M ontag didnt have Fabers voice in his ear through the green bullet. Bradburys main concern about the movie involved Julie Christie playing the roles of Linda and Clarisse McClellan. In the movie, Truffaut casted Julie Christie as two completely different individuals, who in the book were different base on their age and disposition.Truffaut possibly casted her in these two polar opposite roles to portray Montags feelings towards both of them. When Montag met these ladies, he saw that they were both energetic and lively, although, Linda had upset this trait after their marriage while Clarisse had still possessed it. Bradbury would find it necessary to cast two different ladies as these characters because of how opposite they were in their age, personality and style according to the book. While being interviewed, Bradbury mentions, Oskar Werner is wonderful in the lead.Werner did do Montag justice due to his impressive acting skills and his ability to play the role. Therefore, I can understand how Truffaut had casted these characters and the importance of the roles they play. Some of the positives things occurring in the movie were the effects of the film score and the alternate ending. Film score is original music written to specifically accompany a film. There is a distinct relationship between the mood and setting and the score of the movie.In the movie, whether it was a dramatic event or an action, such as the scene where the Salamander is racing to its destination, there is a soundtrack of sound effects or music that enhances the dramatic event or action. In the film, the ending didnt completely match up to the book as Bradbury thought it would have. In the book, Clarisse was not a part of the ending of the book at all, but was rather killed off in the beginning of the book. The alternate ending in the film showed Clarisse meeting up with the book people also and not being killed off at any time.I find this alternate ending a pleasure rather than Bradburys ending because I dont commemorate Clarisse, the young, beautiful lady who questioned everything and actually took time to stop and look at her surroundings, should have just ended at the beginning. I liked the fact that Truffaut allowed her character to continue onto the ending of the movie. The alternate ending and the effects of the film score contained in Truffauts film added up with the initial plot of Bradburys novel conclude in a magnificent dramatic story that many would find interesting.The cinematic version of Fahrenheit 451, directed by Franois Truffaut, and the written novel by Ray Bradbury are dissimilar in plenty of ways. Factors of the movie that Bradbury found enjoyable included the alternate ending, the great score, and Oskar Werner as Montag. Some aspects of the movie that he didnt find pleasure in were putting Julie Christie in two roles in the same film and the elimination of Clarisse McClellan, Faber, and the Mechanical Hound. Although Bradbury found heterogen eous flaws in the film, I can conclude that considering the time the film was created and the point of view of the director, the film was an enormous success.